|
Post by Mink on Jun 8, 2008 2:33:29 GMT -5
Let's say we try your #2 suggestion. What if someone drills for oil and finds a dry hole....or several dry holes? That will cost them a pretty penny, no? So, then they hit oil........who pays for the dry holes?
|
|
|
Post by subdjoe on Jun 8, 2008 8:34:35 GMT -5
Exploration costs are factored in now, Mink. Your argument can be used for any oil field, by the way, not just the ones that TNG mentioned. Cost of doing business that the end users are already paying for. And, with the advances in the art and science of geology, I doubt that many dry holes get drilled anymore.
|
|
|
Post by The New Guy on Jun 8, 2008 13:19:42 GMT -5
it's extremely hi-tech these days. oil companies can spend hundreds of millions, even a billion dollars to find a new "hole." they are very carefull about where they point their drill bits. many have geologists, seismologists, and every other kind of -ologist on hand to make sure they hit the oil. 99% of the time that they poke a hole they hit it. as much as it costs to explore they really can't afford NOT to hit it the first time.
|
|
|
Post by Mink on Jun 8, 2008 21:36:02 GMT -5
The reason I chose that suggestion is because it was on the news just this week. A geologist-turned business man in Texas might hit oil less than half of his attempts, spending million while hitting many dry holes in the process. I saw many workers. No seismologist was in that equation.
|
|
|
Post by harpman1 on Jun 9, 2008 0:14:53 GMT -5
A newscast is a product. It sells better if something exciting or frightening is part of the story.
TNG is right on w/how it works finding & collecting oil. The cost of all exploration is the responsibility of the producer. BIG OIL spends BIG BUCKS & risks Billion$ looking for the goo.
It is a dirty, dangerous job w/no guarantee of success. Petroleum exploration, production, & refinement is among the riskiest businesses on earth.
At this point in time they are investing most of the billions in current record profits into alternative energy sources to replace their current product. They intend to sell us the next form of energy as well.
These are people just like you & me. The idea that oil co.s are hell-bent on destroying the planet for short-term riches is a fairytale told by fools & children.
That said, I am amazed how many seemingly normal adults actually believe it. Testimony to the effectiveness of The Romantic Lie; a lie too exciting & fun not to believe.
|
|
|
Post by saunterelle on Jun 10, 2008 10:20:24 GMT -5
The point is, we need to break our dependence on oil altogether. Perhaps high gas prices are just what we need to move us to really invest in exploring other options. Whining about not drilling enough domestically and building more refineries is just denial, putting a band-aid on the problem. High gas prices have people driving less and selling their SUVs. That's great! But it should have been done because it's the right thing to do, not because of high gas prices.
|
|
|
Post by iraqvet2003 on Jun 10, 2008 10:33:03 GMT -5
Just because we throw money at researchers doesn't mean we'll see any returns the next day.
People are clamoring for relief now! So why aren't we searching for domestic oil stores? Why are we content to depend on foreign oil?
We should be doing what we can to find domestic oil to relieve the gas prices sooner, while simultaneously researching renewable energy that is viable.
Further, Government money goes out to the lowest bidder. Typically, lowest bidder means lowest quality. For something as important as "renewable energy" going to the lowest bidder is a waste of money.
We might want to defer to the Market on this. Viable renewable energy is going to make some people very rich in the future. Allow private investors to support this research and let the government work on getting us the oil we require now.
|
|
|
Post by jgaffney on Jun 16, 2008 11:54:47 GMT -5
Saunterelle sez...
Great! This is what we need to hear more of! The progressives, who have been clammoring for years for a reduction in the consumption of gasoline, are actually gleeful with the current turn of events. The talk in the Congress about excess profits taxes is just a smokescreen - Congress won't do anything, while they continue to collect gasoline taxes and secretly revel in the fact that gasoline consumption is finally falling. "I feel your pain" - Right!
But, answer me this, Saunterelle: What is your solution for the mid-term situation, where petroleum is expensive but the new sources of energy have not yet come on line? Please don't confine your answer to gasoline - petroleum influences nearly every factor of your life.
|
|
|
Post by jgaffney on Jun 16, 2008 12:03:01 GMT -5
Here's some more information from The American Thinker: Most of the people who revile Big Oil for "obscene profits" have absolutely no idea how pervasive petroleum is in the 21st Century, or what it takes to find the oil, get it out of the ground, and deliver it in the product form we demand. In the old PeeDee forums, there were several posters who would echo the old trope, "No Blood For Oil." I would challenge those people to live one week without oil. No one took me up on that.
|
|
|
Post by Mink on Jun 25, 2008 0:17:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jgaffney on Jun 25, 2008 0:27:12 GMT -5
Saunterelle, how are you doing on your petroleum-free lifestyle?
|
|
|
Post by saunterelle on Jun 25, 2008 11:54:07 GMT -5
Here's my answer from another thread: "You're right, we rely heavily on petrol based products in our day to day lives. The solution should not be "where can we find more oil." It should be "since we've hit peak oil, oil is no longer cheap, and it keeps us beholden to the Middle East, lets pour money into new technologies that will break our dependence on oil." This is something we haven't done. The Republican plan (drill, drill, drill) just prolongs our problem." If we put more money into products like these: www.ecoproducts.com/ we could eventually ween ourselves off petroleum based products altogether. Unfortunately, the oil industry has a stranglehold on the American economy.
|
|