Death to global-warming skeptics?

[harpman1]

There would be a lot more Weathermen in prison or running Chicago schools if they were competent enough to build a bomb.

After the police plucked their body chunks from the rubble of Daddy's NYC Brownstone, the cowards Ayers and Dohrn ran and hid for years.

Courageous revolutionaries....NOT!

[saunterelle]

Jun 9, 2009 9:18:42 GMT -5 The Big Dog said:

The patently offensive blog article that spawned this has since been retracted, but it's impossible to go back and unring a bell, isn't it? The author wouldn't have written it and put it on the Internet if it was not what he truly believed... there is no funny, there is no satire in the original piece.

Where will be the outcry from the left and their friends the militant environmentalists?

Death to global-warming skeptics?
Pete Chagnon - OneNewsNow - 6/8/2009 5:00:00 AM

UPDATED 6/8/2009 10:20 AM (Central)

Editor's Note: The author of the subject article on TalkingPointsMemo.com has formally retracted the article and apologizes for what he describes as his "extremist global warming" blog post. "The whole post was ill-conceived, poorly written -- and not representative of who I am," the author says. "But I did write it, and I take full responsibility for it. My intention was not to wish imprisonment or execution of global warming skeptics." (Full retraction is available at TalkingPointsMemo.com)

Original story:

A popular left-leaning website recently published some harsh rhetoric concerning deniers of alleged global warming.

According to Marc Morano of ClimateDepot.com, the left-leaning website TalkingPointsMemo.com recently published an article that issued this public appeal: "At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers?" The article accused "right-wingers" of blocking fixes to the problem of supposed "climate change" and stated that when "end of the world"-type events start to take place, "how will we punish those responsible?"

Morano admits he was disturbed by the post because many liberal talk radio hosts and political activists use Talking Points Memo as their go-to source.

"Talking Points Memo [is a] very influential site, and what they did -- now it's not isolated, it's not a joke -- what they did is they followed the advice of the environmental leaders who have been championing this kind of behavior for a long time now," he explains.

This story represents the worst that is the mindset of militant environmentalism, and also shows the true colors of socialist totalitarianism that are the foundation of the militant environmentalist movement.

That guy in the Prius next to you on the freeway.... he could be your executioner.

Your whole premise here is pretty weak. You are complaining about some guy with no pollitical pull who posted something on a blog and then retracted it, apologized for it, and even went so far as to say "The whole post was ill-conceived, poorly written -- and not representative of who I am." What did O'Reilly do after doctor Tiller was killed by a man who was enraged by the flames of hatred and lies that he helped spread? Did he apologize?

[harpman1]

Did Bill say "Good job" or "Someone go kill the other abortionists"?

If not, he has no need to apologize.

[saunterelle]

Jun 13, 2009 17:55:55 GMT -5 harpman1 said:

Did Bill say "Good job" or "Someone go kill the other abortionists"?

If not, he has no need to apologize.

Of course he should apologize. He spread lies about the doctor on a national stage, mentioning him on 29 separate programs.

[harpman1]

So listing a person's accomplishments(killing thousands of viable babies)requires an apology?

He was accurate and did not have to lie about this butcher.

[The Big Dog]

Jun 13, 2009 18:11:58 GMT -5 saunterelle said:

Of course he should apologize. He spread lies about the doctor on a national stage, mentioning him on 29 separate programs.

What lies? Documentation please, otherwise I call bullshit.

And again... this thread has nothing to do with O'Blowhard. You are trying to take it away from that which is a reflection of you.

Or so it would seem.

[harpman1]

Yup.

He's full of bullshit.

Again.

[subdjoe]

"Your whole premise here is pretty weak. You are complaining about some guy with no pollitical pull who posted something on a blog and then retracted it, apologized for it, and even went so far as to say "The whole post was ill-conceived, poorly written -- and not representative of who I am."

He retracted it when he got caught exposing his true feelings. Not representative of who he is? Bullshit. Pure, unadulterated bullshit. It tells us EXACTLY who and what he is. THAT is what he is ashamed of - his secret is out.

[capttankona]

Jun 13, 2009 14:40:49 GMT -5 saunterelle said:

I guess this is like Bill O'Reilly stoking the flames of hatred that got Dr. Tiller killed. Difference is, some right-wing sheep actually acted on the lies that were spewed: www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/05/31/tiller/

Tiller's name first appeared on "The Factor" on Feb. 25, 2005. Since then, O'Reilly and his guest hosts have brought up the doctor on 28 more episodes, including as recently as April 27 of this year. Almost invariably, Tiller is described as "Tiller the Baby Killer."

Tiller, O'Reilly likes to say, "destroys fetuses for just about any reason right up until the birth date for $5,000." He's guilty of "Nazi stuff," said O'Reilly on June 8, 2005; a moral equivalent to NAMBLA and al-Qaida, he suggested on March 15, 2006. "This is the kind of stuff happened in Mao's China, Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Soviet Union," said O'Reilly on Nov. 9, 2006.

O'Reilly has also frequently linked Tiller to his longtime obsession, child molestation and rape. Because a young teenager who received an abortion from Tiller could, by definition, have been a victim of statutory rape, O'Reilly frequently suggested that the clinic was covering up for child rapists (rather than teenage boyfriends) by refusing to release records on the abortions performed.

Wake me when an ecoterrorist actually shoots someone because of their beliefs! Until then, you are supporting the side that kills, not me.

I suppose lighting peoples homes on fire with them and their children inside just does not rise to your expectations of violence, does it.

[The Big Dog]

Come now captain.... asshattery knows no bounds when a progressive gets sanctimonious.

[capttankona]

Yeah, you are right. He probably does not even get the reference, even though it happened less then 200 miles from where ever he calls home.

[heckheckle]

The propeller on my tinfoil hat was spinning so fast that it flew right off. Whoo-eeee!
What is this Forum coming to? For one thing, I wish I had not seen that Photo, again.