|
Post by The Big Dog on Aug 12, 2008 0:49:40 GMT -5
What Edwards did is wrong, no doubt. I don't condone his behavior, but since you guys are pointing fingers, look into your own party. Shall I name some names? What would that do? "It's OK for him.... not ok for him", it is unacceptable, period. Ex-squeeze me? Where did I say that it was okay for one and not the other to be a lying, philandering, whore chasing SOB? Please show me where in my record I have ever said that. If you can't then please put the broad brush back in the bucket and work in finer strokes. What is wrong, dear lady, is the apparent lack of care and concern given to L'Affaire du Edwards by your friends in the mainstream press. That is what is really unacceptable. It was they, after all, who sat on the story for more than half a year, while Mr. Edwards was actively campaigning no less. What's more disgusting would be America's paper of record, the New York Slimes, now contemplating going after John McCain on an unfounded rumor, when they never touched the Edwards story with even a ten foot pole. NYT: Edwards Scandal Not Our Style, Unproven McCain Affair IsBut that, apparently is what passes for political reporting in this day and age.
|
|