|
|
Post by bolverk on Aug 19, 2008 19:00:21 GMT -5
Kick them Out if they don't vote the party line. That is the major problem with Democrats in this state.
|
|
Len
Apprentice Member
Posts: 74
|
Post by Len on Aug 21, 2008 13:12:55 GMT -5
What's the matter with you?
Can you not recognize the Party of Tolerance and Understanding?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mink on Aug 21, 2008 23:42:52 GMT -5
Well, good for her for doing her job and representing her district.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that if she was supported by her party, it would empower the people she represents and if that happened, we would open the doors to more illegal immigrants. She is in a no-win predicament. Who do you help?
|
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on Aug 22, 2008 11:00:00 GMT -5
That is not the point, and you damn well know it Mink. Your party will not allow for their members to vote their mind if it is against the great machines positions. If they do, they are cast out among the surfs. The great party of tolerance... what a joke they are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mink on Aug 22, 2008 20:11:27 GMT -5
Politics, politicians........one has to wonder what they are all about? It is a game, if anything and although I don't have a story proving it happens on both sides, I bet the same thing happens on the so-called "conservative" end.
I do happen to commend Parras for actually taking her job seriously.......even though I don't agree with making illegal immigration any easier, which is what she was really supporting.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Big Dog on Aug 23, 2008 7:58:21 GMT -5
Where do you get that out of the linked article in the original post? How does making your legislative focus to have water available for farmers in your largely agricultural district support illegal immigration? I'm really curious to see your explanation on this leap of logic. |
|
|
|
Post by The New Guy on Aug 23, 2008 11:27:15 GMT -5
i guarantee she will find a way to work "bush" into the equation.
|
|
|
|
Post by subdjoe on Aug 23, 2008 14:05:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Mink on Aug 23, 2008 14:22:59 GMT -5
Where do you get that out of the linked article in the original post? How does making your legislative focus to have water available for farmers in your largely agricultural district support illegal immigration? I'm really curious to see your explanation on this leap of logic. Big Dog, although our agriculture needs water, it is also extremely reliant on migrants. What is the surprise here? |
|
|
|
Post by subdjoe on Aug 23, 2008 16:46:56 GMT -5
So, by your reasoning since we eat, we also are reliant on migrants (note, there is a HUGE difference in migrant workers and illegal immigrants - I;ve known a double handful of white migrant workers who follow the crops) we must therefore support open boarders. That is a hell of a stretch even for you, Mink.
I have to ask, seriously, not trying to be nasty about it, if you are feeling all right. The past few weeks your posts have been really weak, grasping at any straw that drifts by, making wild swings of resaon that have no foundation in anything that was said, and in general not being the Mink we know and love.
|
|
|
|
Post by The New Guy on Aug 24, 2008 2:07:09 GMT -5
i too, have noticed that mink's posts are even less coherent than usual. i'm a bit concerned.
|
|
|
|
Post by The New Guy on Aug 24, 2008 2:07:40 GMT -5
|
|
