|
|
Post by subdjoe on May 28, 2008 20:03:08 GMT -5
((said in grade school taunting chant)) bolverk is a thingy head! Bolverk is a thingy head!
ROFLMAO!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by The New Guy on May 28, 2008 20:08:36 GMT -5
ok, the fun's over. i fixed it so you can now say...........
Dick
and quite a few other words. however, i did keep some really naughty ones on the restricted list. one's that i'm sure most of us wouldn't use anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mink on May 28, 2008 23:32:33 GMT -5
Dick Cheney is a D_ _k....just kidding  testing....testing |
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on May 29, 2008 11:18:52 GMT -5
((said in grade school taunting chant)) bolverk is a thingy head! Bolverk is a thingy head! ROFLMAO!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on May 29, 2008 11:19:44 GMT -5
Dick Cheney is a D_ _k....just kidding testing....testing You know, he probably is. But, what are you gonna do? |
|
|
|
Post by saunterelle on May 29, 2008 12:01:38 GMT -5
While you guys are joking around Obama is overtaking McCain in the polls. The Neocon's house is crumbling.
|
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on May 29, 2008 12:11:32 GMT -5
Obama is a liar, I quote:
"Would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?" asked Stephen Sixta, a video producer who submitted the question for the CNN/YouTube Democratic debate.
Mr. Obama, the first candidate to respond, answered, "I would."
Now he states:
"I didn’t say that I would meet unconditionally as John McCain maintained, because that would suggest whether it was useful or not, whether it was advancing our interests or not, I would just do it for the sake of doing it," he said. "That’s not a change in position, that’s simply responding to distortions of my position."
Having no preconditions is unconditional. So which is it Obama? Did you or did you not say you would meet with our enemies without preconditions (unconditionally)?
|
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on May 29, 2008 12:14:35 GMT -5
While you guys are joking around Obama is overtaking McCain in the polls. The Neocon's house is crumbling. Neocons, what joke. The neosocialists may yet win this election, only time will tell. If they do, then we will get a spate of bad laws, just like we did in 1968, which is what led to the quagmire we are in now with illegal immigration. |
|
|
|
Post by saunterelle on May 29, 2008 12:23:08 GMT -5
Sure beats our TRILLION dollar quagmire in Iraq. I'd take illegal immigration over that any day!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Big Dog on May 29, 2008 13:52:52 GMT -5
While you guys are joking around Obama is overtaking McCain in the polls. The Neocon's house is crumbling. Do you even know what a "neocon" is? The answer, based solely on the post above, would be "no". |
|
|
|
Post by harpman1 on May 29, 2008 16:08:11 GMT -5
Neocon:
A Jewish Democrat that grew up, became an actual adult & favors the aggressive expansion of liberty worldwide & is willing to do something long, painful & expensive to accomplish it.
Or, to the American left,
A Jew.
|
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on May 29, 2008 16:43:10 GMT -5
Sure beats our TRILLION dollar quagmire in Iraq. I'd take illegal immigration over that any day! We noticed, and it has cost us as more then a trillion dollars in money, services, hospitals, education, illegal activities and violence. Not to mention about 3,000 lives on September 11, 2001, as some of the hijackers were in this country illegally. Meaning, your policy towards illegal immigration is directly responsible not only for those deaths, but also this war and every life lost in it. |
|
