|
|
Post by subdjoe on Feb 5, 2013 4:07:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ferrous on Feb 5, 2013 11:40:35 GMT -5
Notice the way she drops the clip and pulls back on the slide to eject the round in the chamber before handing the gun to the other person.
Just the way it's suppose to be done when handing someone a gun.
Awesome kid...
|
|
|
|
Post by subdjoe on Feb 6, 2013 6:05:30 GMT -5
Notice the way she drops the clip and pulls back on the slide to eject the round in the chamber before handing the gun to the other person. Just the way it's suppose to be done when handing someone a gun. Awesome kid... I believe she was just showing clear before reholstering the weapon, Ferrous. I agree...awesome kid. If I didn't think I would get the credit be blamed for causing an apoplexy I'd send this to DiFi, Boxer, Pelosi, Schumer, et al. And to this ditz: www.theblaze.com/blog/2013/01/25/dem-rep-women-should-serve-in-combat-but-shouldnt-use-assault-weapons/PIERS MORGAN: I have an interview coming up with two young women who wrote a piece in which they said they wanted the rights of the AR-15 weapon at home because they feared they would be attacked and they wanted a gun that would guarantee they would murder or would kill their attacker. How do you respond to that particular argument, which is they believe under their second amendment right they should be allowed an AR-15?
CAROLYN MCCARTHY: I will tell you, if you talk to professionals, hunters and certainly sportsmen, they’ll tell you that’s not the gun to use. A rifle is more accurate. It’s certainly easier for a woman to be able to do that.I like how, from one side of her mouth she is saying that women are just as capable as men in everything, while from the other side she is saying that women aren't as capable as men in everything (even though she is flat ass wrong about ARs v. traditional rifles...and I didn't know that the military used the AR-15). |
|
|
|
Post by danceswithdogs on Feb 6, 2013 18:47:50 GMT -5
Score another win for an armed homeowner! One of three men who allegedly broke into a Las Vegas home was reportedly killed by the homeowner, who opened fire on the group. Fox 5 reports that Mark Schwendener knew his family’s security was jeopardized when he noticed a stranger lurking around his west Las Vegas home early Monday. "He was coming this way,” he told the station. “My family was screaming and crying. My daughter was screaming and freaking out because she didn't want me to go outside with a gun. I was like, ‘I don't want him to come into the house.’” Schwendener, a recent burglary victim, called 911 before retreating into a bedroom to retrieve a handgun, according to Las Vegas Metro Police. He then fired at least one round at the suspects, prompting them to flee. One of the suspects, however, later identified as a Latino male, died at the scene from a gunshot wound. "When police officers cleared the victim's backyard, they found a third individual deceased in the backyard from an apparent gunshot wound," Metro Officer Bill Cassell told the station. A second unidentified suspect attempted to flee the scene by car but collided with an arriving patrol car, Cassell said. A third suspect who fled eastbound on foot remains on the loose. An investigation is ongoing, but charges aren’t expected to be filed against Schwendener. "What caused the gunshot, what caused the man's death, that will be determined by the Clark County coroner," Cassell said. Read more: www.foxnews.com/us/2013/02/06/las-vegas-homeowner-reportedly-kills-intruder-another-man-sought/#ixzz2KAKWa9WSOk, here is a good example of why it should be up to the homeowner/gun owner just what type of gun he chooses to own, or how large the magazine capacity should be. If these 3 thugs were each armed with even a minimum capacity (6) weapon, that would be 18 chances for them to shoot and kill the homeowner and his family, while he (if the new laws on magazine capacity limits promoted by Dems/gun-grabbers were obeyed) would run out of ammo and be at the mercy of the thugs (who probably would not adhere to ANY limitations). The Dizzy Dems and their lack of knowledge or common sense is just stunning.  |
|
|
|
Post by danceswithdogs on Feb 6, 2013 19:33:06 GMT -5
Oh my! Seems guns, even illegal ones, are fine for Media Matters, but not for you and me. Media Matters reportedly used illegal guns to protect organization's leader Published January 28, 2013 FoxNews.com The former Media Matters for America staffer in charge of guarding the group’s leader not only committed multiple felonies when he carried firearms across the country but did so with the organization’s blessing and money, according to a report in the The Daily Caller Monday. Multiple guns were reportedly bought and used to protect liberal leader David Brock. They were purchased with member money and were green-lighted by the head of the group, according to an unnamed source. The Daily Caller reports that Brock's assistant carried a concealed Glock handgun without the proper permit. [glow=red,2,300]The Glock-toting revelation flies in the face of the strong anti-gun stance Media Matters touts.[/glow] During one of Brock’s gun-guarded trips, he went to a Democratic summit in California. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who re-introduced a gun control package last week in the House including a renewed assault-weapons ban, was also there. Read more: www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/28/media-matters-reportedly-uses-illegal-guns-to-protect-organization-leader/?intcmp=obinsite#ixzz2KAWz18t6 |
|
|
|
Post by sonnypie on Feb 8, 2013 19:23:13 GMT -5
Naw, Joe. But it does show what they would be up against if they make it necessary for America to once again revolt against tyrannical Government. The British got their asses handed to them, and the Socialists could as well.  |
|
|
|
Post by subdjoe on Feb 9, 2013 4:19:44 GMT -5
Hey! Found it on Youtube!
|
|
|
|
Post by subdjoe on Feb 9, 2013 4:21:23 GMT -5
Naw, Joe. But it does show what they would be up against if they make it necessary for America to once again revolt against tyrannical Government. The British got their asses handed to them, and the Socialists could as well. You don't think Schumer, Pelosi, DiFi, and some others would keel over from seeing a 13 year old competently using a submachine gun, shotgun, and pistol with an "assault magazine?" |
|
|
|
Post by danceswithdogs on Feb 10, 2013 15:53:36 GMT -5
You don't think Schumer, Pelosi, DiFi, and some others would keel over from seeing a 13 year old competently using a submachine gun, shotgun, and pistol with an "assault magazine?" [/quote]
Knowing how Libs react rather than think with common sense, I would expect they have already reported this girl to Child "Protective" Services and requested the girl be removed from an "abusive and dangerous home situation".
That's what Libs do best....react to anything they don't approve of in a way that defies common sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by ferrous on Feb 10, 2013 16:09:25 GMT -5
Isn't that what one of their more prominent Lib's do... Sign an Executive Order making all Americans of Japanese descent criminals and locking them up in Determent Camps?
These Gun Laws might make a whole bunch of us Americans, criminals and subject to arrest and/or seizure of our property.
Seems to me a very calculated reaction on their part, in their march towards Social Justice.
Eliminate the opposition...
|
|
|
|
Post by subdjoe on Feb 10, 2013 21:02:15 GMT -5
I wrote to the Hon. Mr. Thompson, and also to DiFi and Babs suggesting that they look up 9066 and go pay a visit to Manzanar, then tell us how it is a Good Thing to strip some citizens of their civil rights. Oh, and even got a letter to the editor into the PD suggesting that their supporters do the same. I have a feeling that the reference was lost on them.
|
|
|
|
Post by danceswithdogs on Feb 10, 2013 21:08:43 GMT -5
That's why they are trying so hard to demonize those of us who own and use firearms. They trot out "victims" of violence and point at gun owners (all inclusive) as being "responsible" for the harm those "victims" suffered and any future harm done to anyone via a firearm.
By demonizing or marginalizing those with whom they disagree, they somehow feel elevated and pious, while being the most ignorant and foolish people on the planet.
Their goal is to find ways to de-legitimize firearms, make them illegal (except for the elite among them) and eventually disarm those who disagree with their agenda.......bring history to mind? Of course they pooh-pooh any mention of this, but that is their aim.
We will keep and bear arms to protect ourselves against a tyrannical government. Pretty simple. They are out to grab guns they say no one needs to use for hunting. Well, of course they want to take away any weapons that could be used to prevent the over-stepping of those who abuse their authority.......no matter what political party they belong to....and right now that party is sure showing their true colors. "Assault weapon" are maybe not needed for 4 legged animals, but they sure will help eliminate the two legged ones who mean us harm.
|
|
