|
|
Post by Mink on Nov 3, 2008 18:58:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on Nov 3, 2008 19:29:29 GMT -5
I don't need to look any further then the United Kingdom identifier in the link to know it comes from a biased source who means nothing in the scheme of American life.
Worst: Jimmy Carter, Second: Richard Nixon in my life time. You want to rank them differently, I could care less. Bush may not be popular, but he kept your ass safe and able to freely speak some of the nasty stuff about a President that has ever crossed the lips of an American. And no brown shirts have been knocking on your door about it either.
As far as the Brits ranking our Presidents, they can kiss my ass. The worst was King George III, but Obama is going to make him look like a generous man.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mink on Nov 3, 2008 21:23:45 GMT -5
Oh, I see, if a wannabe Canadian supports the almost worst president, you are fine, but if a British newspaper rates the same nut on a lower scale as he is, you don't give a holy hoot........
Hmmmm, now that is really an objective point of view.
The only ass he saved was his own.....just look how he will deregulate more before leaving office!
|
|
|
|
Post by jgaffney on Nov 3, 2008 23:57:03 GMT -5
The only ass he saved was his own.....just look how he will deregulate more before leaving office! Funny, I don't remember any outrage from the Left over the flurry of regulations that the Clinton administration rolled out during its last days. To say nothing of the hundreds of pardons handed out literally on his last day in office. Selective outrage has another name: hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on Nov 4, 2008 17:14:35 GMT -5
Oh, I see, if a wannabe Canadian supports the almost worst president, you are fine, but if a British newspaper rates the same nut on a lower scale as he is, you don't give a holy hoot........ Hmmmm, now that is really an objective point of view. The only ass he saved was his own.....just look how he will deregulate more before leaving office! Now see, here is a major difference between you and me and Democrats and Republicans. I will not question if the lady is Canadian or not, yet you imply she is not, based on your own stereotyping of Canadians. And, you extrapolate that she supports Bush from her statements and I interpret that she can not understand the withering attacks from vitriolic people, because the man has done some real good while in office. She even enumerated the items. Hers was the objective view point. Yet, you could not resist marginalizing her, attacking her and accusing her of things you feel were not true but could not prove otherwise. You even went as far as to paint her with a bigoted brush by saying she did not sound Canadian. Democrats are some of the best bigots in the world, you are proof of that. Now you know the fundamental difference between you and me. I take people at their word, you inject your feelings as a legitimate means to marginalize them. You were wrong on the Palin ethics issue, as the independent investigator has clearly proven and you are wrong on this as well. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
