|
Post by bolverk on Jul 21, 2008 17:59:41 GMT -5
So, suanterelle, just so you know that I did not smite you out of hand, here is why I did.
You attempted to equate homosexuality as normal, based on activities in the animal kingdom. To those activities you apply human motivation, sentiment and human psycho-dynamics. So, even though you call people idiots for the smites you receive, at least yours are earned. You never document anything. I, on the other hand, provide you with plenty of sources.
But, every time you smite me, it is a badge of honor. It means that I have provided information you can not dispute, and you smite me out of frustration, rather then it being justifiable.
|
|
|
Post by saunterelle on Jul 21, 2008 18:04:15 GMT -5
"The term homosexuality should be limited to the human species, for in animals the investigator can ascertain only motor behavior. As soon as he interprets the animal's motivation he is applying human psychodynamics--a risky, if not foolhardy scientific approach."
That's a fair argument. It doesn't mean that animals can or can't be homosexual, it simply means that we can't know. The same logic should applied to religion.
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on Jul 21, 2008 18:16:07 GMT -5
Now see subdjoe, a perfect reason to smite saunterelle again. In this post, he has taken a jab at religion, which has nothing to do with the subject. A jab that insults more then 75% of the world at large. saunterelle would probably fall over dead if he realized that the catholic church actually used to do same sex marriages in the past.
Let's keep it on topic saunterelle. Animals are not proof that homosexuality is normal. It's not normal, but that does not mean we should discriminate or shun homosexuals in our society.
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on Jul 21, 2008 18:16:51 GMT -5
And, just so you know, if an hour had passed, you would be smote again for that statement.
|
|
|
Post by The New Guy on Jul 21, 2008 20:00:57 GMT -5
when a dog humps a human's leg should that be considered beastiality in the dog world?
|
|
|
Post by subdjoe on Jul 21, 2008 23:31:27 GMT -5
Now see subdjoe, a perfect reason to smite saunterelle again. In this post, he has taken a jab at religion, which has nothing to do with the subject. A jab that insults more then 75% of the world at large. saunterelle would probably fall over dead if he realized that the catholic church actually used to do same sex marriages in the past. Let's keep it on topic saunterelle. Animals are not proof that homosexuality is normal. It's not normal, but that does not mean we should discriminate or shun homosexuals in our society. Yeah, he does like to take gratuitous shots at religion. And pushes his religion on the rest of us. AND thinks that the State should adopt it and push it on us. In fact, the ACLU is doing a good job of forcing that religion on us.
|
|
|
Post by JustMyOpinion on Jul 22, 2008 9:36:55 GMT -5
Tiptoeing here...
I plucked this from a message board regarding this very topic, and I admit this logic baffles me.
DO YOU BELIEVE IN THE POWER OF GOD? === IF GOD LEAVES MESSAGES / SIGNS FOR US TO READ. === DO SUPPOSE 852 FIRES IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WAS A SIGN OF HIS DISAPPROAVAL OF GAY MARRIAGES?=== JESUS DIES FOR THAT OUR SINS MAYBE FORGIVEN. IT'S NEVER TOO LATE TO CHANGE YOUR WAYS BEFORE THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT ARRIVES!!!!!!!!!! *=========LAST WORDS========== SIN TODAY~DIE TOMMOROW * DIE TODAY~LIVE FOREVER FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND THIS MESSAGE IT'S CLEAR YO DONOT UNDERSTAND GODS WORD WRITTEN IN THE BIBLE. SEEK FORGIVENESS BEFORE THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT ARRIVES.
|
|
|
Post by saunterelle on Jul 22, 2008 11:02:00 GMT -5
My point with the shot at religion is simply to illustrate hypocrisy. You will outright dismiss the possibility that animals can be homosexual because it would be "applying human psychodynamics." Yet at the same time you'll believe in an all-powerful, judgmental, Christian God without any proof whatsoever. Isn't that also "applying human psychodynamics?" That's unbelievable JMO, sort of reminds me of this one (just as ridiculous): unrealitycheck.com/articles/god_hates_republicans/god_hates_republicans_hurricane_map.htm
|
|
|
Post by crossride on Jul 22, 2008 11:28:54 GMT -5
I for one am opposed to gay dogs marrying.
|
|
|
Post by JustMyOpinion on Jul 22, 2008 14:51:13 GMT -5
saunterelle, I got a nice chuckle from that link. I wonder why anyone would even think of something like that in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by JustMyOpinion on Jul 22, 2008 14:52:22 GMT -5
I for one am opposed to gay dogs marrying. Well, crossride your true colors are finally evident. You dog hater you.
|
|
|
Post by ferrous on Jul 27, 2008 18:11:59 GMT -5
Aaaahhh yes, Gay Dogs We see the little darlings spinning on their two hind legs wearing pink tutus and lapping up the fun. Or as more than likely we see one male dog exerting dominance over another one. Help Stop Cruel and Pointless 'Gay Sheep' Experimentsgetactive.peta.org/campaign/GaySheepExperiments[Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), a school that has received criticism in the past for torturing monkeys in its labs, has officially been outed. Information has been brought to light about ridiculous “gay sheep” experiments that are being conducted at the school. OHSU experimenter Charles Roselli is spending millions of taxpayer dollars to kill homosexual rams and cut open their brains in an attempt to find the hormone behind homosexual tendencies so that these tendencies can be changed. Roselli is also working with experimenter Frederick Stormshak of Oregon State University (OSU), who has surgically inserted an estrogen implant in the bodies of these rams in an effort “to restore tissue levels of estrogen comparable to those of heterosexual rams and affect sexual behavior accordingly.”] Seems Dr. Roselli has a different view of his research. www.nytimes.com/2007/01/25/science/25sheep.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5088&en=fceec7c701115eaf&ex=1327381200&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss[Dr. Roselli, a researcher at the Oregon Health and Science University, has searched for the past five years for physiological factors that might explain why about 8 percent of rams seek sex exclusively with other rams instead of ewes. The goal, he says, is to understand the fundamental mechanisms of sexual orientation in sheep. Other researchers might some day build on his findings to seek ways to determine which rams are likeliest to breed, he said.] Why do 8% of rams seek sex exclusively with other rams while only 2.3% of human males find it appealing to have sex with only other men? The 10% Myth[The Census 2000 figures show that homosexuals exist in far fewer numbers in our population than homosexual activists would have us believe. Homosexuals used these census figures to claim that the number of same-sex households had experienced an explosive growth during the past ten years. This is untrue. According to Census 2000 figures, there are a total of 106,741,426 households in the U.S., only 00.42% of those are unmarried same-sex households. This is less than one percent. Yet activists claimed that these figures showed a surge in same-sex households since 1990. However, the Census Bureau issued a disclaimer saying that 1990 figures and 2000 figures could not be reconciled because of the different ways the questions were asked in 2000. www.traditionalvalues.org/urban/two.phpAnd just when you thought you teenage daughter was safe while showering in gym... CA Senate Passes Homosexual Education["Los Angeles Unified School District has already implemented the policies in this bill," reported CRI Legislative Liaison Meredith Turney. "In that district, boys who perceive themselves as girls may enter the girls' locker room and restroom. Teachers and school officials are required to hide the gender identity of a transgender student if the parents are unaware of what's taking place at school. This astonishing policy will be expanded to every school in the state if SB 777 becomes law."] www.cbn.com/cbnnews/164863.aspx
|
|