|
Post by bolverk on Jul 18, 2008 17:58:56 GMT -5
Nancy Pelosi. Bar none.
I quote: "After rejecting 18 months of attempts by the Democratic majority in Congress to adopt redeployment timetables, the President now proposes a vague ‘general time horizon’ that falls far short of a commitment to ending our involvement in Iraq."
No kidding Nancy, because only an idiot would have thought setting a time-line back then was a good thing. Fortunately, now the Iraqis are closer then ever to taking over their own security.
But Scott Stanzel said it best, "It's important to remember that the discussions about timeline issues previously were from Democrats in Congress who wanted to arbitrarily retreat from Iraq without consideration of conditions on the ground. All of the discussions that we have always had have been based on conditions on the ground and making progress in the country, and we are doing just that."
Nancy just can not get it through her head. It's about security you idiot.
|
|
|
Post by The New Guy on Jul 18, 2008 18:43:21 GMT -5
i wonder if she, dirty harry reid, and obama would like to also set a timeline for withdrawal from the wars on drugs, poverty, homelessness, global warming, etc. i agree she is the "worst speaker o' da house" EVER and the polls illustrate that perfectly.
|
|
|
Post by The Big Dog on Jul 18, 2008 18:57:55 GMT -5
Well Senator Obama is in favor of a global war on poverty... to be funded by you and I, of course.
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on Jul 21, 2008 12:27:54 GMT -5
It is funny, since Obama as chairman of a Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee to deal with NATO's involvement in Afghanistan, has never even called a single hearing. I bet he races to hold hearings on poverty.
|
|