|
Post by subdjoe on Oct 31, 2009 0:16:04 GMT -5
Ah! At last heckle admits that his arguments are mindless. Nothing but feel good blather.
|
|
|
Post by capttankona on Nov 3, 2009 12:03:52 GMT -5
Are you upset because they arrested the kid for having set off pipe bombs and in possession of a chain saw? Or are you upset because a gun was one thing the article said they looked into?
You can't win with some people. You know, the ones who give you a mindless arguement, and they don't realize that most people with ordinary common sense know what you mean, and don't pay much attention to those who would try to distract people by a lot of useless words.
|
|
|
Post by capttankona on Nov 3, 2009 12:05:39 GMT -5
Thanks for the perfect reply to Minks obvious dodge on the question. The point is really simple. You can outlaw guns, but you can't stop the ones who want to do these deeds.
So why not answer the question Mink, why shouldn't they outlaw Pipe and Chainsaws if they are used in senseless crimes?
|
|
|
Post by capttankona on Nov 3, 2009 12:07:35 GMT -5
subdjoe, they arrested the kid for pipes and a chainsaw, at school! Don't you think if there was reason enough, authorities would do the same if they knew a kid was producing these things at home or elsewhere, let alone in possesion of a gun or guns? You sound just like a politician. You get asked a direct question and you do not answer it. It is simple really, when are they going to create waiting periods or out law the possession of pipe and chainsaws within 1,000 feet of a school? After all, mixed together they are "weapons of mass destruction."
|
|
|
Post by capttankona on Nov 3, 2009 12:09:55 GMT -5
Guns kill 30,896 people a year in our country, far more than gun deaths in all other industrialized nations combined. Pipes and chainsaws kill very few relative to how many people own them. What reason is there to ban these items? There is no reason to ban any of these items. England has banned guns, but it has not stopped gun deaths. So, in theory, they have a higher death rate per legal guns then we do. But, you never look at from that light, because you are biased against people exercising their second amendment rights because you are a statist hack.
|
|