|
|
Post by The New Guy on Oct 6, 2008 9:30:20 GMT -5
isn't it funny how i'm off the forum for two weeks and my karma goes down to 1? someone must be smiting me behind my back. shame, shame, shame.  |
|
|
|
Post by The Big Dog on Oct 6, 2008 13:37:11 GMT -5
isn't it funny how i'm off the forum for two weeks and my karma goes down to 1? someone must be smiting me behind my back. shame, shame, shame. Maybe they wear off with inactivity? Just sayin.... as I wouldn't want to think our membership would dredge that pool. And in the interest of fairness, as you've jumped back into the fray, I exalt you. |
|
|
|
Post by jgaffney on Oct 6, 2008 13:49:47 GMT -5
Sarah is out of her league as one Republican put it and if you want to keep betting your money on a person taking a crash course on just one debate, can you imagine how much more you'd lose if she is elected? Earth to Mink: Sarah Palin is not running for President. If you would like to compare experience, let's put your presidential candidate up against mine. By looking at the candidate's past, one can predict how he'll act in the future. Too bad most of your candidate's past is being cloaked by the media. otherwise, we'd know more about Saul Alinsky, the Annenberg Challenge, Alice Palmer, Raila Odinga, Frank Davis,.......... OK, I'll stop. But the list goes on and on. |
|
|
|
Post by Mink on Oct 6, 2008 20:43:04 GMT -5
Sarah is out of her league as one Republican put it and if you want to keep betting your money on a person taking a crash course on just one debate, can you imagine how much more you'd lose if she is elected? Earth to Mink: Sarah Palin is not running for President. If you would like to compare experience, let's put your presidential candidate up against mine. By looking at the candidate's past, one can predict how he'll act in the future. Too bad most of your candidate's past is being cloaked by the media. otherwise, we'd know more about Saul Alinsky, the Annenberg Challenge, Alice Palmer, Raila Odinga, Frank Davis,.......... OK, I'll stop. But the list goes on and on. Helloooo, Earth to gaffney....as I said, Sarah is "out of her league" and those words are from a Republican. |
|
|
|
Post by jgaffney on Oct 6, 2008 23:35:25 GMT -5
Mink, do you have a response to my series of questions: If you would like to compare experience, let's put your presidential candidate up against mine. By looking at the candidate's past, one can predict how he'll act in the future. Too bad most of your candidate's past is being cloaked by the media. otherwise, we'd know more about Saul Alinsky, the Annenberg Challenge, Alice Palmer, Raila Odinga, Frank Davis,.......... Or, are you just going to hammer me with one quote from one Republican? What if I posted a quote from a prominent Democrat who said that Hillary would have made a better choice for Veep? What would your response be to that, huh? That's two questions. Answer them in that order, pls. |
|
|
|
Post by Mink on Oct 6, 2008 23:49:59 GMT -5
Gaffney, we are in a thread on palin. I may have given you words from one Republican because I just chose one.....there are more. Didn't you read the link I provided?  |
|
|
|
Post by jgaffney on Oct 7, 2008 0:00:37 GMT -5
Sure, I read it. One Republican feels that way and you have a crusade? I am pointing out that it is disingenuous for a Democrat to claim lack of experience on Palin's part when the Dem's own candidate is so shallow and her own Veep candidate admits that Hillary might have been a better choice. Now do you understand where my response is coming from?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mink on Oct 7, 2008 0:49:52 GMT -5
No, I don't. Biden is not a wannabe politician, he just admitted in all honesty that Hillary would have been a better VP, so?
|
|
|
|
Post by jgaffney on Oct 7, 2008 0:53:58 GMT -5
A "wannabe politician"?? I will assume from your answer that you are completely discounting Palin's executive experience so far, something that is sorely lacking on the Democrat ticket. Please give me an example of executive experience on the part of your candidates.
|
|
