|
|
Post by subdjoe on Jun 4, 2013 0:17:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by danceswithdogs on Jun 4, 2013 16:11:20 GMT -5
He lives in the very same fantasy land where the other Dimwits reside. Either they are in total denial or they are part of the problem.
Those idjits don't stop to think about what might happen if a Conservative Administration were to take over power and treat Libs in the same manor they have treated us with impunity.
|
|
|
|
Post by ferrous on Jun 5, 2013 16:01:08 GMT -5
There would be Senators like our very own DiFi who would be demanding and getting the perpetrators thrown out of office like she did to AG Roberto Gonzales who really only did what every new Administration does. Getting rid of the old Administrations lawyers and putting in theirs. The Libs would be out in the streets demanding Justice with a constant assault by the Main Stream Media. They would unleash the OWS crowd to intimidate anyone who disagrees with them. We'd be hearing from Rep Pelosi, Maxine Waters, and all the other clowns in their party demanding Justice. But it seems that those like Lois Lerner quietly go about their illegal partisan deeds even under opposing Administration. She was doing this same thing back in 1996 when she went after Senator candidate Al Salvi. illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2013/06/lerner-asked-salvi-for-200000-plus-never-run-again-promise.htmlAnd she's in line to get a another big promotion to head the IRS's Gestapo like Secret Police in the implementation of Obamacare... Pathetic. |
|
|
|
Post by danceswithdogs on Jun 5, 2013 20:34:19 GMT -5
The whole damn administration is pathetic. (but still dangerous)
|
|
|
|
Post by ferrous on Jun 6, 2013 5:37:57 GMT -5
No, Dances.. The whole problem goes much deeper. The Democrats hold the belief that the End Justifies the Means...
Saul Alinsky Rules For Radicals
Of Means and Ends [edit]
In the second chapter of Rules for Radicals, Alinsky proposed a new question for community organizers to consider when bringing activist groups together. Normally when looking to achieve a certain goal, organizers would ask “do the ends justify the means?” Alinsky stated that the real question for what methods are acceptable for accomplishing a goal should be “does this particular end justify this particular means?” His purpose here, and for the rest of the chapter, is to delve into goal setting and achievement for community organizing. As a strong proponent for direct action tactics, Alinsky held to the idea that unorthodox methods for affecting change were acceptable. If the actions undertaken brought to light the problem a community was facing, than the means used were acceptable. He believed that once a particular goal is set, the means necessary to achieve it, given the community involved, become more apparent and easier to discern if appropriate or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by danceswithdogs on Jun 6, 2013 14:55:28 GMT -5
Does that mean we can to likewise? It might just work to give 'em a dose of their own medicine. Of course the fools don't think beyond the here & now......unless it's to hold the false belief they will remain in power forever......next election will be "our turn" and perhaps employ the same dirty tactics to them and say "oh well, we won. Deal with it"
|
|
|
|
Post by ferrous on Jun 6, 2013 16:39:05 GMT -5
That's what Obama has said on numerous times to Republicans... They won so deal with it...
The Chicago Thug in the White House and the stench in Washington is unbearable.
But it looks like we have to deal with it for some time to come.
The End always justifies the Means for them. Just like Saul Alinsky taught them.
|
|
" Since WHEN did we EVER trust the IRS? Guy is so out of touch with reality wonder he isn't locked up for observation.
" Since WHEN did we EVER trust the IRS? Guy is so out of touch with reality wonder he isn't locked up for observation.
