|
|
Post by surefire on Nov 5, 2008 21:40:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Big Dog on Nov 5, 2008 21:55:27 GMT -5
"Should" has nothing to do with it. He is going to be made to pay, and pay dearly. That's how it works on the hill.
While I hate to see any seat go D, John Warner was a doddering RINO who sold his soul on many occassions and should have been turned out years ago. Newly elected Mark Warner while socially somewhat liberal, is staunchly pro-gun, at least based on his record as governor and before. He is also pro-military from what I've read on him.
|
|
|
|
Post by subdjoe on Nov 5, 2008 21:56:58 GMT -5
Of course he should. He dared to quesiton the O, so tolerant, diverse and inclusive DNC. Anyone who isn't in lockstep with their diversity and brings in different ideas must be shunned and punished.
|
|
|
|
Post by surefire on Nov 5, 2008 22:01:10 GMT -5
"Should" has nothing to do with it. He is going to be made to pay, and pay dearly. That's how it works on the hill. While I hate to see any seat go D, John Warner was a doddering RINO who sold his soul on many occassions and should have been turned out years ago. Newly elected Mark Warner while socially somewhat liberal, is staunchly pro-gun, at least based on his record as governor and before. He is also pro-military from what I've read on him. That sounds like good news-- getting a RINO out ... it sounds like Warner is a solid moderate Democrat: www.ontheissues.org/Mark_Warner.htmHopefully he has the nuts to stand up to the extreme in his party. In regards to Lieberman, it is unfortunate that being moderate is punishable on the hill. |
|
|
|
Post by bolverk on Nov 6, 2008 12:36:24 GMT -5
Democrat always punish those who exercise their constitutionally guaranteed right to express their opposing views.
|
|
