|
|
Post by moondog on Jan 30, 2009 12:35:46 GMT -5
Your right, it is different. Bush actually used his powers in the spirit of the founders intentions, to commute a sentence, not to allow some scumbag to skate without ever going to trial.
|
|
|
|
Post by barneyfife on Jan 30, 2009 13:15:27 GMT -5
It's different. Bush interfered with a sentence that had been handed down by a jury of the border agent's peers (implying that they did not get it right). Clinton bypassed the court system alltogether with his pardon. Which Clinton did a FEW HUNDRED TIMES....READ THE LINKS CLINTON COMMUTED a BUTT TON of sentences...so I guess Clinton interfered with sentences handed down by juries of peers as well (implying that they did not get it right).................................. And then he pardoned a WHOLE 757 Jumbo Load of Dope Dealers and Smugglers with an occasional kidnapper or tax dodger...feeling I guess they didn't "need" to go to trial... Are you THAT clueless..?? |
|
|
|
Post by moondog on Jan 30, 2009 13:48:50 GMT -5
TBD, I wanted to thank you for the awesome posts you make. Keep swimming against the tide of liberalism and progressive foolishness, you are an inspiration.
|
|
